Index | Recent Threads | Who's Online | Search |
|
New Thread |
|
yuvaltaylor
![]() |
Have you tried the InList function? You can create a custom list by going to Research / Components / Lists. Click on "New" and add your tickers. Then in your universe rules put InList("[name of list]"). If this isn't what you want, perhaps you could clarify your aim? Yuval Taylor Product Manager, Portfolio123 invest(igations) Any opinions or recommendations in this message are not opinions or recommendations of Portfolio123 Securities LLC. |
||
|
Whycliffes
![]() |
Thank you, Yuval. It appears to work, but it generates some odd results. Depending on whatever universe is selected, I get varied outcomes on the screen backtest. I assume that the universe in a screen backtest should be "all stocks"? (Because the data to the tickers in the list are retrieved from a universe?) |
||
|
yuvaltaylor
![]() |
Maybe some of your universes are leaving some of the InList stocks out at certain points. Yes, All Stocks would be your best bet. Yuval Taylor Product Manager, Portfolio123 invest(igations) Any opinions or recommendations in this message are not opinions or recommendations of Portfolio123 Securities LLC. |
||
|
Whycliffes
![]() |
Will this not cause a problem in screenbacktests or simulation back tests? As far as I can tell, the rating is based on a comparison with the stocks in the universe and not "inlist." The ranking will then be tried against the "all stocks" universe and will be completely different than if it were conducted against the shares in the "inlist." Ore? I also understand that "inlist" can be used for simulator backtesting, but should the inlist code (rule) be in both the buy and sell rules? |
||
|
yuvaltaylor
![]() |
Put the InList in your universe rules rather than in the sim. That way the ranking will be done on the InList stocks and the others will be ignored. Yuval Taylor Product Manager, Portfolio123 invest(igations) Any opinions or recommendations in this message are not opinions or recommendations of Portfolio123 Securities LLC. |
||
|
Whycliffes
![]() |
Thank you very much! That is precisely what I was looking for. |
||
|
|