Portfolio123 - View Thread - Results for FCF items are different with new syntax

Home Ready-2-Go Portfolio Ranking Screener Stock ETF Tools Community Help

Forums Email User Polls Feature Requests Groups

Index | Recent Threads | Who's Online | User List | Search

Portfolio123 » List all forums » Forum: Ranking Systems and Factors/Functions » Thread: Results for FCF items are different with new syntax

Thread Status: Normal
Total posts in this thread: 13

[Request a Feature] [Post new Thread]
[Add To My Favorites] [Watch this Thread]

Author

This topic has been viewed 847 times and has 12 replies

marco

UNITED STATES
Joined: Jan 1, 1970
Posts: 3980
Status: Offline

Re: Results for FCF items are different with new syntax

Reply to this Post
Reply with Quote

If that is the case is there a way to figure out if the data from (0,QTR) contains pre-annoucement data?

I added a new factor under FACTOR->DESCRIPTIVE->CompleteStmt
----------------------------------------
Portfolio123 Staff

[Jul 24, 2012 4:41:57 PM]

[Link]

Hedgehog
Advanced Member

NETHERLANDS
Joined: Jul 21, 2010
Posts: 112
Status: Offline

Re: Results for FCF items are different with new syntax

Reply to this Post
Reply with Quote

If that is the case is there a way to figure out if the data from (0,QTR) contains pre-annoucement data?

I added a new factor under FACTOR->DESCRIPTIVE->CompleteStmt

Thank you, it is getting better each day!

[Jul 24, 2012 4:44:14 PM]

[Link]

Jim101
Advanced Member

UNITED STATES
Joined: Apr 5, 2011
Posts: 98
Status: Offline

Re: Results for FCF items are different with new syntax

Reply to this Post
Reply with Quote

Thanks, Marco.

FCFTTM and FCF(0,TTM) now produce identical results.

The CompleteStmt factor is outstanding and divided FCF(0,TTM,KEEPNA) into 2 subgroups.

Jim

[Jul 24, 2012 8:02:45 PM]

[Link]

[Show Thread Printable Version] [Post new Thread]

Free Trial / Log In