HomeReady-2-GoPortfolioRankingScreenerStockETFToolsCommunityHelp
ForumsEmail UserPollsFeature RequestsGroups


  Index  | Recent Threads  | Who's Online  | User List  | Search
  Search  
Quick Go »
Thread Status: Normal
Total posts in this thread: 3
[Request a Feature] [Post new Thread]
[Add To My Favorites] [Watch this Thread]
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 743 times and has 2 replies Next Thread
skim90
Member


AUSTRALIA
Joined: May 29, 2008
Posts: 1
Status: Offline

Single Stock Portfolio Reply to this Post
Reply with Quote

New to 123. Can anyone tell the merits or returns from using one stock traded at a time in a portfolio (not the same stock). To me it would mean reduced brokerage and ease of management. Has anyone used this type of portfolio?
[Jun 3, 2008 5:52:27 AM] Show Post Printable Version     [Link] Report threaten post: please login first  Go to top 
greyhound_dog_1
Advanced Member
Member's Avatar

UNITED KINGDOM
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Posts: 20
Status: Offline
Re: Single Stock Portfolio Reply to this Post
Reply with Quote

Hi

I refer you to a current thread under discussion entitled 'Robust or Bust?'.

Generally, the consensus is that the performance of a single stock portfolio would be as good as random, and that you shoud aim for at least 20 stocks, if not 50, to ensure forward performance will reflect the simulation.

Interactivebrokers offer $1 per trade, low commission, ideal for trading large or high turnover ports.

Andrew
----------------------------------------
Andy
[Jun 3, 2008 7:48:30 AM] Show Post Printable Version     [Link] Report threaten post: please login first  Go to top 
BJS
Advanced Member


UNITED STATES
Joined: Sep 14, 2004
Posts: 633
Status: Offline

Re: Single Stock Portfolio Reply to this Post
Reply with Quote

 
Generally, the consensus is that the performance of a single stock portfolio would be as good as random, and that you shoud aim for at least 20 stocks, if not 50, to ensure forward performance will reflect the simulation.


I'm not sure I would call this a consensus. Some members take th opinion that 40 or 50 stock portfolios are necessary to give realistic expectations. Others use a combination of 3 to 5 stock portfolios to spread risk. This can be done if you have a very strong ranking system.

For example, I have a real port that only holds 2 or 3 stocks at a time. It only has two buy rules:

1. Avgdailytot(20)>150000
2. Rank>=99.95

And it has only 1 sell rule:

1. Rank<99.95

The strength is all in its ranking system. Right now it is holding 2 stocks. I have been trading this with real money since July of last year, and it is doing fine. But note that the drawdown is 30%. With small ports like this, you do need to be able to stomach the drawdowns. But I also have other 'small' ports, so I have my money spread out between several different systems.

The point is, there are many ways to approach a winning trading philosophy. Find one that fits your style, and you enjoy trading. Take the time to test it and paper-trade it. If everything looks right, don't let others tell you that it can't be done.

Brian
----------------------------------------
Attachment EB100.PNG (34102 bytes) (Download Count: 61)

[Jun 3, 2008 10:34:34 AM] Show Post Printable Version     [Link] Report threaten post: please login first  Go to top 
[Show Thread Printable Version] [Post new Thread]

Free Trial  /  Log In
Username or Email
Password
Stay logged in
Can't remember username or password?