| Index | Recent Threads | Who's Online | User List | Search |
|
|
 |
Portfolio123 » List all forums » Forum: Ranking Systems and Factors/Functions » Thread: P123 System/Ranking/NA's differences |
|
Total posts in this thread: 4 |
[Request a Feature]
[Post new Thread] [Add To My Favorites] [Watch this Thread] |
| Author |
|
|
pmda
Advanced Member
|
Looking for consistancy in the #NA's and Final Statements. When reviewing systems-Ranking, Technamental, Balance4 and Momentum Value, will show very different #NA's and Final Statement s. I would think these items would be the same regardless of what system was being reviewed. I was comparing these symbols- EDPFY SWCEY AZ PBR AEG VCP SDA. |
||
|
|
pmda
Advanced Member
|
These differences of #NA's change the ranking which impact buy/sell. Why would just changing the system change the number of NA's |
||
|
|
DennyHalwes
Advanced Member UNITED STATES Joined: Apr 28, 2004 Posts: 1532 Status: Offline |
pmda, The number of NAs represents the number of the specific factors and functions in the Ranking System with an NA value. It is not the number of NAs in the Financial Statement. Since different Ranking Systems use different factors and functions, they would have different number of NAs. Denny  ---------------------------------------- "The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking that we were at when we created them". Albert Einstein |
||
|
|
pmda
Advanced Member
|
Thanks, I did think they related to the FS |
||
|
| [Show Thread Printable Version] [Post new Thread] |
Re: P123 System/Ranking/NA's differences
