| Index | Recent Threads | Who's Online | User List | Search |
|
|
 |
Portfolio123 » List all forums » Forum: Data related issues » Thread: NA's |
|
Total posts in this thread: 14
|
[Request a Feature]
[Post new Thread] [Add To My Favorites] [Watch this Thread] |
| Author |
|
|
chasfiji
Advanced Member
|
For example, CashFlPSTTM is the sum of Income After Taxes minus Preferred Dividends and General Partner Distributions plus Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization. If depreciation is missing, it should still calculate the factor. However, if a major component, like shares outstanding is missing, the factor would not be calculated. ---------------------------------------- Portfolio123 Staff |
||
|
|
charles123
Advanced Member
|
OK I see what you're saying. I guess I'm asking if the reason there are so many NA for CFPSTTM are some of the same reasons for the NA's in SALESTTM. Such as the requirements you listed previously for SALESTTM. |
||
|
|
chasfiji
Advanced Member
|
An answer to the original question: 1) The majority of the Cash Flow TTM is not calculated due to the same reasons as the Sales TTM. 2) If the company does not have a depreciation value, the Cash Flow TTM is not calculated. I am in the process to discuss the logic of their reasoning for making depreciation mandatory line item versus an optional one. ---------------------------------------- Portfolio123 Staff |
||
|
|
charles123
Advanced Member
|
Thanks a lot for the update. I appreciate it. |
||
|
|
[Show Thread Printable Version] [Post new Thread] |
