HomeReady-2-GoPortfolioRankingScreenerStockETFToolsCommunityHelp
ForumsEmail UserPollsFeature RequestsGroups


  Index  | Recent Threads  | Who's Online  | User List  | Search
  Search  
Quick Go »
Thread Status: Normal
Total posts in this thread: 14
Posts: 14   Pages: 2   [ 1 2 | Next Page ]
[Request a Feature] [Post new Thread]
[Add To My Favorites] [Watch this Thread]
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1798 times and has 13 replies Next Thread
charles123
Advanced Member


UNITED STATES
Joined: Sep 26, 2006
Posts: 184
Status: Offline

NA's Reply to this Post
Reply with Quote

What is the reason for the high number of NA's? Using the screener and screening for SalesTTM, CFTTM, etc. and setting these equal to NA there are hundreds of stocks returned even when opting to use previous quarter data for NA's.
[Sep 11, 2007 10:59:07 AM] Show Post Printable Version     [Link] Report threaten post: please login first  Go to top 
chasfiji
Advanced Member


UNITED STATES
Joined: Jan 30, 2007
Posts: 53
Status: Offline

Re: NA's Reply to this Post
Reply with Quote

We have placed a question into Reuters.
----------------------------------------
Portfolio123 Staff
[Sep 11, 2007 12:54:21 PM] Show Post Printable Version     [Link] Report threaten post: please login first  Go to top 
charles123
Advanced Member


UNITED STATES
Joined: Sep 26, 2006
Posts: 184
Status: Offline

Re: NA's Reply to this Post
Reply with Quote

Any word from Reuters yet?
[Sep 12, 2007 12:17:25 PM] Show Post Printable Version     [Link] Report threaten post: please login first  Go to top 
chasfiji
Advanced Member


UNITED STATES
Joined: Jan 30, 2007
Posts: 53
Status: Offline

Re: NA's Reply to this Post
Reply with Quote

Reuters response:
"This may take some time to review the many instances you have provided. I am actively pursuing an answer with our data team and will contact you within two days with a further update or resolution to this query. If you have any questions or concerns in the mean time, please do not hesitate to let me know."
----------------------------------------
Portfolio123 Staff
[Sep 12, 2007 4:12:21 PM] Show Post Printable Version     [Link] Report threaten post: please login first  Go to top 
chasfiji
Advanced Member


UNITED STATES
Joined: Jan 30, 2007
Posts: 53
Status: Offline

Re: NA's Reply to this Post
Reply with Quote

Comment from Reuters:
Reuters has found an issue of how they are calculating cash flow per share TTM. They are reviewing about 1400 companies to verify the issue and correct it. They will be updating us tomorrow.
----------------------------------------
Portfolio123 Staff
[Sep 13, 2007 9:48:34 AM] Show Post Printable Version     [Link] Report threaten post: please login first  Go to top 
charles123
Advanced Member


UNITED STATES
Joined: Sep 26, 2006
Posts: 184
Status: Offline

Re: NA's Reply to this Post
Reply with Quote

Thanks for the update. There is an issue with other factors as well, such as Pr2SALESTTM. I come up with hundreds of companies with NA even with selecting previous quarter fill-in. This appears to be more than a TTM cashfolw caluculation issue.
[Sep 13, 2007 9:57:19 AM] Show Post Printable Version     [Link] Report threaten post: please login first  Go to top 
chasfiji
Advanced Member


UNITED STATES
Joined: Jan 30, 2007
Posts: 53
Status: Offline

Re: NA's Reply to this Post
Reply with Quote

SalesTTM is generated when these conditions are met:
1) at least 4 quarters or 2 semi-annuals reported by the company
2) should not be any hybrid period in the latest 4 quarters (e.g. - Japanese ADRs, the companies report in 3M, 6M, 9M, & 12M formats.
3) should not be a year end change
4) company should have reported Revenues


Two Examples:
BHP (ADR) - does not have quarterlies
Softbank - presentation in semi-annual periods is different from the third quarter; therefore, the third quarter 9 month numbers have been not broken further in 3 months

I would this resolves some of your questions.
The database, which we are working on will resolve an issue like this one.
----------------------------------------
Portfolio123 Staff
[Sep 13, 2007 3:27:45 PM] Show Post Printable Version     [Link] Report threaten post: please login first  Go to top 
charles123
Advanced Member


UNITED STATES
Joined: Sep 26, 2006
Posts: 184
Status: Offline

Re: NA's Reply to this Post
Reply with Quote

Thank you. Makes more sense now. I would be nice to see this resolved in the future. I am assuming the same criteria or similar apply to CFTTM.
[Sep 13, 2007 3:39:54 PM] Show Post Printable Version     [Link] Report threaten post: please login first  Go to top 
chasfiji
Advanced Member


UNITED STATES
Joined: Jan 30, 2007
Posts: 53
Status: Offline

Re: NA's Reply to this Post
Reply with Quote

For CashFlPSTTM, it is not necessarily the same because there are many more line items that are combined into a single factor. If one line item is missing, it should, in theory, be able to calculate the factor.
----------------------------------------
Portfolio123 Staff
[Sep 13, 2007 3:52:01 PM] Show Post Printable Version     [Link] Report threaten post: please login first  Go to top 
charles123
Advanced Member


UNITED STATES
Joined: Sep 26, 2006
Posts: 184
Status: Offline

Re: NA's Reply to this Post
Reply with Quote

Do you mean because of the various line items it should "NOT" be able to calculate the factor if one line item is missing?
[Sep 13, 2007 5:56:17 PM] Show Post Printable Version     [Link] Report threaten post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 14   Pages: 2   [ 1 2 | Next Page ]
[Show Thread Printable Version] [Post new Thread]

Free Trial  /  Log In
Username or Email
Password
Stay logged in
Can't remember username or password?