Portfolio123 - View Thread - Frank versus using the Rankings

Home Ready-2-Go Portfolio Ranking Screener Stock ETF Tools Community Help

Forums Email User Polls Feature Requests Groups

Index | Recent Threads | Who's Online | User List | Search

Portfolio123 » List all forums » Forum: Screener » Thread: Frank versus using the Rankings

Thread Status: Normal
Total posts in this thread: 3

[Request a Feature] [Post new Thread]
[Add To My Favorites] [Watch this Thread]

Author

This topic has been viewed 1060 times and has 2 replies

timfong888
Advanced Member

UNITED STATES
Joined: May 10, 2006
Posts: 22
Status: Offline

Frank versus using the Rankings

Reply to this Post
Reply with Quote

I am getting wildly disparate results from using Frank versus using the Rankings:

FRank("Pr52W%Chg",0,1)>90

I used the above as a way to get a ranking of those stocks in the top 90-percentile. But I get vastly different results when I run a simulation.

Is there something I'm unaware of?

[Apr 9, 2007 1:42:12 PM]

[Link]

martinfierro
Advanced Member

UNITED STATES
Joined: Nov 9, 2005
Posts: 215
Status: Offline

Re: Frank versus using the Rankings

Reply to this Post
Reply with Quote

I have found this same problem in the past.
Ideas ?
Martin

[Apr 9, 2007 4:19:41 PM]

[Link]

Stittsville123
Advanced Member

CANADA
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Posts: 1306
Status: Offline

Re: Frank versus using the Rankings

Reply to this Post
Reply with Quote

Can you expand on this? It isn't clear to me what you are comparing.

Steve

[Apr 9, 2007 8:46:46 PM]

[Link]

[Show Thread Printable Version] [Post new Thread]

Free Trial / Log In